Monthly Archives: November 2013

Tools: Twitter

I have been asked to blog about my Open Education experiences as a part of my Master’s course, and this raised quite a few questions in my mind. The biggest one was: What is open education? Being me, I instantly went to Google to find an answer. It was a bit of shock to see that the majority of examples, definitions and sites I was given were for open classrooms.  The next step: ask my knowledgeable, university librarian, big sister. Her answer: “online courses or experiences where you can learn about things, but not necessarily get credit for it. A university course, perhaps, but it wouldn’t really count.” Well, that cleared things up, but then the panic hit. I needed to take another course I wouldn’t get credit in order to blog about it for a course I am getting credit in? I had no clue where to start. Thankfully, my fellow classmates were less panicky than I, and I found out I had been doing “Open Education” on twitter for a few years thanks to #kinderchat!

I am not going to talk about the wonderful group of people I have met through #kinderchat; there just is not enough time. But, for those of you who don’t know, #kinderchat is a twitter chat on Monday nights from 6:00-7:00 and it involves teachers mostly from North America who gather to discuss trends, policies and practices in Kindergarten and Grade 1. They have a hashtag which, when used outside of the chat times, is usually responded to by one or more “tweeps” who are there for support and advice.

The use of twitter for education is, I believe, a relatively new idea. When I first joined twitter years ago, I rarely saw groups gather to discuss topics and I don’t think the term hashtag had even been created. Now there are chats dedicated to many different grades, education systems, pedagogy, and even wine chats. Many have a set time, a schedule and some have a variety of moderators, while others have one or two that constantly take the helm. Both ways work, but only having one or two moderators can be a bit exhausting for the moderator, and might get tiresome for the participants. Having a variety of moderators can be an organizational nightmare, I imagine, but offers a greater variety of voice when choosing topics. Having some active participants in the chats is key. I started a chat with a friend this year, and although our groups are usually small, the chat is active. We are able to discuss the topic at hand, and have some great insights into our students’ learning, and our own. For me, having people to learn about Reggio Emilia from online is a huge help, as I am a novice with this kind of learning/teaching. Our varying areas of knowledge and our different time zones can be a great bonus, as a question or idea can be posted at recess , and all sorts of help and experience can have weighed in before the break is even finished.

No matter how great a tool is, though, there will always be some drawbacks. I enjoy the chats I am involved in, but sometimes they are just too fast for me. It can be very difficult, if it is a “burning” topic, to keep up with the opinions, ideas and yes, sometimes the egos of the chat. As in conversation, it is extremely easy to get off topic, and all too easy to be distracted by what is going on in the area around me. I sometimes come back to the chat and have to spend 10 minutes catching up. It continues to be very hard to read voice in some tweets, and I know that with a “real” conversation, I can rely on the tone and facial expressions to gather more information on the speaker. That is extremely difficult to do on twitter, and can lead to some misunderstandings.

Twitter as an open education tool is a good one, I believe. It allows so many voices to participate, and gives people the chance to “lurk” if they are not quite ready to push that “tweet” button. It is available to anyone who wants to join in, and I believe it gives people reading your feed, the opportunity to see what is going on in the lives of educators. We have had people pop in who are not teachers, but parents, who want to share their perspectives on topics.  I look at my students connecting on twitter to learn about classes around the continent and realize that I am on the same path as them with my connections to these teachers.

Tagged , ,

One Little Question….

Last year, I became aware of the Reggio Emilia approach to education. For those of you who don’t know what this is,the Reggio Emilia approach uses natural world objects, loose parts, provocations and exploration in an emergent learning way. It is far from how we in North America have taught children in the past, but embraces much of what early childhood experiences should be. That being said, there are pockets of people around this continent who have always embraced this play based, exploration way of working with children. Reggio Emilia has gained in popularity recently, as we are taking a step away from pencil and paper, academic Kindergartens and Grade 1 classes.

I have been trying to learn about this approach and have relied on many educators who I consider experts in Early Childhood Education. One of the places I have gained inspiration is the Monday night #kinderchat. I have sat in on many fascinating discussions about play and learning with some extremely knowledgeable people. What I wasn’t seeing was a group dedicated to Reggio Emilia. Well, in true form, I asked one little question: “Is there a Reggio chat? Looking to expand my knowledge.”

That one question with less than 140 characters created a lot of responses. There was definitely an interest in exploring Reggio Emilia, and I admit, my panic started to rise when people suggested I start one. I sought some advice from the folks who started #kinderchat and I got the best advice from @happycampergirl, “So, this one day, we made up a hashtag… and then we picked a timeslot….” I had to laugh; it sounded so simple and yet my heart was pounding! A fellow teacher from Ontario was interested in helping out and she thought we could lead the chat together. In a matter of  about 25 tweets and 2 days, #reggiochat was born.

 I consider #reggiochat “my baby” right now. I know I share responsibility of it with my PLN partner, but it has given me further reason to read and explore more into the world of Regio Emilia. At the inaugural chat on Oct. 2, 2013 there were teachers from Canada, the United States and even one from Singapore. I admit that the first chat seemed like the most nerve-wracking hour for me. I had some questions to pose if the conversation lagged, but they weren’t really needed. Much like the idea of emergent curriculum, the conversation emerged on its own. The ideas that were shared and the knowledge of the people in the chat was astounding. I was able to take ideas and start using them right away in my classroom. I have so many questions and this arena of chatting on twitter lets me ask and not feel ignorant, as I know there are others out there who are wondering the same thing. We have continued to meet, although there have been some hiccups. Illness, holidays and another Reggio chat sharing Wednesday have all been things to contend with. I believe we are now beginning to meet every 2 weeks, and although the groups are often small, they are knowledgable.

Through #reggiochat, I have also started to use Storify to archive the conversations we have. That was another learning curve for me. I never thought I would be archiving twitter chats about student documentation. It is a great tool though. Easy to use and ties into my twitter account so I can quickly access it after a chat, before I race off to #enviroed or a Campfire Chat. 

I hope we continue to meet and grow. I hope more poeple bring their brilliance and wonder to share with #reggiochat. I am proud fo starting this little chat, and opening up the world of Reggio Emilia and emergent curriculum to the twitterverse.

Tagged , ,

My Response To A Childhood Icon

In October, as part of Connected Educator’s month, I participated in a series of Campfire Chats hosted on Collaborate. One of the guest speakers for a chat was a man I had listened to my entire childhood.  Raffi Cavoukian is a singer and child advocate. His gentle songs, which appeal to many young children, are well known across Canada and the United States. He lives in Canada and has written a book titled”#lightwebdarkweb Three Reasons to Reform Social Media B4 It Reforms Us”. I admit, I have not read his book, but I used to follow Raffi on twitter. I made the difficult choice to unfollow him when I found that his tweets against technology in the classroom were feeling like personal attacks on my teaching practices. I decided to participate in this Campfire Chat to hear his side of the issue and I went in with an open mind, hoping to reclaim some of the respect I had for this childhood icon.

Raffi began by discussing his background and where his concern for technology in the hands of children developed. Many of his statements were ones that I would not argue with. Early on he mentioned being asked during his travels if kids are different now, and his answer “Kids basic needs stay the same, although the world around them changes tremendously” is an answer I wholeheartedly agree with. His 3 main points in his book focus around Safety, Intelligence and Sustainability, and as I listened to the chat again tonight, I found myself nodding in agreement with many of his statements.

Safety: I know that the recent suicides by cyberbullied teenagers in our country have called  Raffi to action, and I understand where his statements concerning Social Media, Safety and children are coming from. I share those worries and concerns. I love my friend Mardelle’s saying “we are 3 clicks away from crazy” when on the internet. I understand that people do not get the appeal of sharing tidbits of your day, life, interests and complaints, and I completely agree that the businesses creating these Social Media sites need to create safe places for kids, teens and adults to use them. There is a corporate responsibility to keep the sites safe for kids IF they know that children are using these sites. I can wish that Mark Zuckerburg put a gazillion safety features on Facebook to help prevent the cyberbullying, catch any sexual predators and protect any kids on those sites, but I know that it won’t happen. So where are these kids, and teens, going to learn to be safe online and when using Social Media?

Intelligence: Raffi discussed, in some depth, how this tech revolution should be used to grow intelligence, and to not be the addictive “substance” it has become. I had not heard of “Tech Detox” camps before listening to him, and I was stunned that they exist.  He said “What are we really doing here? Where is the restraint going to come from? Where are kids going to learn the digital literacy that allows them to be online safely, but also, as importantly, the restraint. Where are they going to learn the restraint, the discipline with which to put down the devices?”

Sustainability: Raffi did not go into much depth about the sustainable information in his book, but he did touch on the fact that teens in foreign countries are working 10-12 hour days to create the products we are consuming. Again, I cannot look at the factory conditions, low wages and horrible treatment that people go through to create our devices without shuddering. As well, the amount of waste we create by upgrading to the newest device as soon as it comes out is staggering. I see the videos of people lined up for the latest iPhone, Android,  PS4, and they are not there because the one they had 20 years ago was broken. They are there because it is new and shiny. It is an environmental nightmare. How can we influence people to not buy the newest “just because”?

I listened to this Campfire Chat and it seemed as though Raffi was asking these questions about safety, intelligence and sustainability with an obvious answer: school. But it wasn’t. After his informative and interesting presentation, he began to question why we were using technology and social media in the classroom. He continued to imply that imagination and creativity were being stifled by the use of devices in early childhood classrooms. Raffi, for all of his questions, did not see that we, as teachers, are able to show and instruct our children on internet safety, using a device to help develop our thinking and to teach others about our learning. He stated, “The formative being that the young child is, what is forming in the early years, it’s not only a sense of self, but what it feels like to be alive, in a relationship to nature, in a relationship to caregivers. There are wonders of the 3 dimensional world to learn about”. I do not dispute this. Young children need to see, hear, feel, taste, smell, giggle, laugh and cry. They need to self-regulate and they need to learn how to function in a group. What Raffi does not understand or see, is that we are teaching these things and experiencing the wonders of the world around us. My students can go outside and create a fantastic nook in the tree with friends and pretend to be creatures in the forest.  Back in class, I can tweet the photos and experience with the students, to a child in a place where they have never seen a forest. I can talk to the children about the appropriate language we use, the etiquette of Social Media and remind them of our safety rules when tweeting. I know they are not having this conversation at home, and I know they will be on Social Media in a few years.

I admit, I got frustrated listening to Raffi when he implied that my children are mindless drones who sit in front of a screen all day, and so I spoke up. I tried to have him see that an iPad is often veiwed as a tool in my class; no different than wooden blocks, a listening center or whiteboards. To me, in my classroom, it is the equivalent of a VCR, camera, video camera, stereo system and encyclopedia set in one small tool.  If my students are interested in learning about sharks, as my boys are, I can read books and talk to them and discuss sharks till I am blue in the face. We can draw sharks and pretend to be sharks. We can build a tank for sharks to habitat and can look on maps for where sharks live. But I can also, with my “shiny tech” show a video about a shark to take the fear of them away. I can look up information that I don’t have. My students can share their learning with another class, who might also love sharks. They can make connections with kids who live near sharks.

Doing these types of things is not stifling the imagination of young children, it is documenting their experiences and encouraging them to be imaginative. Raffi mentioned that showing a video of an animal prevents the child from imagining the animal’s movements and ways, and my argument then is, why should I let them build with blocks or cook with me? I can’t fathom saying to a child, “imagine baking a pie” when they have no idea what a pie is, or how it looks. I give them the experience. If they choose to create a mud pie outside, or “bake” a vegetable pie in the house center, it is because I have shown them and experienced baking with them. Using a device can show some of our underprivileged children, experiences they may never see. As Matt Gomez typed in the chat box during the conversation, “quality imagination does not just happen”. My ELL students have been able to show us where they come from in India, Korea and Russia. They are able to acquire language through the conversations and work with the device, and being in a lower socio-economic school, our 1 device gives us the opportunity to meet people in our own community, that we would never be able to meet without incurring large costs. For us to chat on twitter with a class in Newfoundland and find out we have similarities, is a joy. For my First Nations students, seeing pictures of drummers and First Nations people in Arizona was a thrill. We could not have had these experiences without some “Shiny Tech”. As Raffi himself once sang:

To everyone in all the world,
I reach my hand I shake their hand.
To everyone in all the world,
I shake my hand like this.

All all together,
The whole wide world around,
I may not know their lingo,
But I can say by jingo,
No matter where you live we can shake hands.

(Raffi, To Everyone In All The World, Baby Beluga Album)

We are shaking hands, and so much more, all on our “Shiny Tech”.

Tagged ,

Project Update!

Today I met again with the fabulous Michelle Hiebert to work on our #tiegrad project. During the session, I looked at the table and had to laugh.

20131109-152511.jpg

20131109-152530.jpg

Yes, we had that many devices: 3 laptops, 2 iPads, 2 phones, 1 camera, and a NERD shirt. I almost feel like we should be writing the “12 Devices of Christmas”!

In short, we worked hard, coughed up a lung, sniffled, ate brilliant brunch and accomplished our goal! Great session overall 🙂

Tagged ,
mardelle sauerborn

Thinking out loud.

heidi echternacht

the personal and professional :: photography, posts, poetry, practice

My Kindergarten Bubble

My life as a kindergarten teacher

Geek My Gadget

Scouring the web for the latest geekware so you don't have to!

Pasir Ridge Intercultural School

We bring the world to our classrooms.

manteachingkindergarten

Just another WordPress.com site

applesandglue

Blogging about everything sweet and sticky...

STaRT Technology Learning Network

Learning Together Through Collaborative Inquiry

web.uvic.ca/~virvine/wordpress

Just another WordPress.com site

Oldfield's Wanderings

Objects in blog are closer than they appear

Catching Readers Before They Fall

Supporting Readers Who Struggle, K-4

Searching for Sunshine

@MauiMickey's Thoughts on Teaching, Family, Travel, Food & Everything Else

Not In A Blue Box

My Journey Documented Here